Learn that services aren’t sustainable by default

An illustration of a sad person looking at a dying flower in a glass of water while a big cloud strikes lightning and pours rain on her

A decade ago there was this idea, that if we could move people from products to services, that would make things a lot more sustainable. Today, a lot of things have become services. But the world isn’t really much more sustainable.

As service owners, creators or workers, we sometimes thing that we’re not really in the problem. We’re not producing mass market shit like fast fashion clothes that get put in a trash as soon as they are worn once. We’re dentists, accountants, office workers. What we create is intangible. So it can’t break the planet, right? Sad news. Services also have a negative impact on the environnement.

An infographic showing the material impact of housing versus food, versus services, versus household goods versus personal mobility and versus clothing and footwear.

Karin Fink made me aware of a publication by the European Environment Agency called « From data to decisions: material footprints in European policy making ». In this report, you can find a graph that clearly shows that even services have a material footprint on the environment.

From what I understand, that report seems to show that Services have a worth material footprint than clothing and footwear, with 11,3% of shares of consumption domain in the EU material footprint compared to 1,3%.

Ness Wright in her course Designing Sustainable Services, shows the many place services can have a negative impact on the climate crisis. She lists (1):

A list of factors that make services contribute to the climate crisis: Where our service is delivered: Building and estates     The physical movement of things in services: Transport    The processes that run our services: Data and digital processes    The physical material of our services: Physical good and devices    The supply chain of our service: Suppliers and procurement    The behavior within our services: User and staff behaviour
  1. Where our service is delivered: Building and estates

  2. The physical movement of things in services: Transport

  3. The processes that run our services: Data and digital processes

  4. The physical material of our services: Physical good and devices

  5. The supply chain of our service: Suppliers and procurement

  6. The behavior within our services: User and staff behaviour

Footnote

(1) This list comes for a preview of Ness’s courses that she shared on Linkedin

Action question

Do you still think your service doesn’t hurt the planet? Who could you ask to show you where your service sucks for the planet?

Daniele's notes